Research based criteria for evaluation disaster planning and managing.
Material type: TextSeries: Preliminary paper ; #247Publication details: [Newark, Del.] : University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, 1997Description: 34 pDDC classification:- 363.347 21
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | F363.347 RES (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 900030511 |
Bibliography: p. 31-34
Discusses what is important in preparing for and managing disaster occasions. The starting point is that what is crucial is not planning or managing per se since there is always a degree of both, but good planning and managing. It is possible to have bad instances of both. Thus, to assess in any intelligent way the preparedness planning for and the managing of disasters requires asking the question: what is good planning and managing? This question is answered on the basis of the results of the empirical research undertaken by social and behavioral scientists over what is now a 40 year period. Discusses rather extensively ten general principles of good disaster planning. The basic point is that any planning can be evaluated as being good or bad depending on how well it meets the ten criteria discussed. Such an evaluation can be made prior to any disaster occasion. This discussion is followed with a presentation of ten general principles of disaster managing. This is done because the view is that an evaluation of the management of a disaster has to use somewhat different criteria than those applied to preparedness planning. Good management does not automatically follow even from good planning since there is only a partial correlation between the two processes
There are no comments on this title.