A risk-sharing model for locating noxious facilities.
Material type: TextSeries: CENTED reprint ; 81Publication details: Worcester, Mass. : The Center, 1989Description: 13 p. : illDDC classification:- 363.7287 20
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 363.7287 RIS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005746451 |
Browsing Australian Emergency Management Library shelves, Collection: BOOK Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Bibliography: p.178-179
Reprinted from Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design; 1988; Vol. 15; p. 165-179
The recent proliferation of facility-siting conflicts underscores the need for new analytical techniques in which the external effects associated with noxious facilities are considered explicitly. In general, in prescriptive facility-location models it is assumed that having populations "closer", as characterised by transport or accessibility advantages, is better for desirable facilities, but, locating "farther" away is better for undesirable facilities. The modeling formulation developed in this paper adds two new concepts to the prescriptive modeling work on locating noxious facilities: 1) "complementary anticover" as a measure of equity for siting facilities that provide a required capacity for producing goods or services, and 2) perceived risk attributable to the scale of these facilities. These two concepts, in conjunction with conventional cost considerations, are used to develop a multiobjective location model that may be used to find locational patterns which mitigate public opposition across a broad range of noxious facilities
There are no comments on this title.