Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com
Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Understanding policy fiascoes.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: New Brunswick, N.J. : Transaction Publishers, c1996Description: v, 173 p. : ill. ; 23 cmISBN:
  • 156000214X
DDC classification:
  • 320.6 20
Partial contents:
Understanding policy fiascoes -- Assessing policy outcomes: social and political biases -- Identifying agents: the ontology of policymaking -- Identifying agents: misfortune or mismanagement? -- Explaining agents' behavior: implicit frames -- Evaluating agents' behavior: analysis as accusing and excusing -- Epilogue: making sense of policy fiascoes
Review: This study tries to make sense of the rise of policy fiascoes. Adapting an interpretive mode of policy analysis, it shows in great detail how not only "partisan" but also "scientific" discourse on policy events contains many biases that promote (or prevent) them being labelled as "fiascoes." These biases are not random occurrences: they reflect deep-seated views about the nature and standards of good governance, as well as certain epistemological commitments about the nature and role of science and knowledge in policymaking.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Books Books Australian Emergency Management Library BOOK 320.6 UND (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 900180126

Includes bibliography: p. [161]-170 and index

Understanding policy fiascoes -- Assessing policy outcomes: social and political biases -- Identifying agents: the ontology of policymaking -- Identifying agents: misfortune or mismanagement? -- Explaining agents' behavior: implicit frames -- Evaluating agents' behavior: analysis as accusing and excusing -- Epilogue: making sense of policy fiascoes

This study tries to make sense of the rise of policy fiascoes. Adapting an interpretive mode of policy analysis, it shows in great detail how not only "partisan" but also "scientific" discourse on policy events contains many biases that promote (or prevent) them being labelled as "fiascoes." These biases are not random occurrences: they reflect deep-seated views about the nature and standards of good governance, as well as certain epistemological commitments about the nature and role of science and knowledge in policymaking.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha