Perception and evaluation of risks : a cross-cultural comparison.
Material type: TextLanguage: ENG Publication details: 1992Description: 39 p. in various pagings : illSubject: In a socio-psychological field study, perceptions and subjective evaluations of risky activities and environmental conditions are investigated in three countries: Germany, New Zealand and Australia. The aim of this cross-cultural project is to analyze the cognitive structure of judgments about the magnitude and acceptability of risks to which individuals are exposed, and to compare risk judgments across countries in which risk issues in general as well as particular risk sources (eg., industrial facilities or natural hazards) have different salience. Data comparisons for countries, for societal groups (eg., ecologists, engineers, feminists) and for types of risks demonstrate manifold differences. However, the considerable influence of psychological aspects on judging risks can be shown in all settings. Altogether the findings confirm the significance of the cultural context of risk evaluations. They are relevant for a better understanding of conflicts about risk and for improving risk communication among the various involved partiesItem type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 302.12 PER (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005732939 |
Browsing Australian Emergency Management Library shelves, Collection: BOOK Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Includes bibliographical references
In a socio-psychological field study, perceptions and subjective evaluations of risky activities and environmental conditions are investigated in three countries: Germany, New Zealand and Australia. The aim of this cross-cultural project is to analyze the cognitive structure of judgments about the magnitude and acceptability of risks to which individuals are exposed, and to compare risk judgments across countries in which risk issues in general as well as particular risk sources (eg., industrial facilities or natural hazards) have different salience. Data comparisons for countries, for societal groups (eg., ecologists, engineers, feminists) and for types of risks demonstrate manifold differences. However, the considerable influence of psychological aspects on judging risks can be shown in all settings. Altogether the findings confirm the significance of the cultural context of risk evaluations. They are relevant for a better understanding of conflicts about risk and for improving risk communication among the various involved parties
There are no comments on this title.