Catastrophe and social order.
Material type:
TextLanguage: ENG Publication details: 1979Description: 12p., 24 refsSubject: Presents three propositions: 1/ there is a growing potential for technologically induced catastrophes; 2/ the capacity to analyze technological risk is inhibited in part because: a/ there is a confusion between low-probability/low-consequence events with low-probability/high consequence risks; and b/ a holistic approach in the analysis of risk is rarely adopted; and 3/ it is usual to underestimate the effects of catastrophic events. It is also argued that existing control systems, including federally regulatory bodies, are inadequate. There is a brief discussion on the difficulties likely to accompany the design and creation of risk control systems presented as a conclusion.
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 302.12 ORR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005267374 |
Browsing Australian Emergency Management Library shelves, Collection: BOOK Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reprinted from Human Ecology, Vol. 7., No. 1., 1979, pp41-52
Reprint
Presents three propositions: 1/ there is a growing potential for technologically induced catastrophes; 2/ the capacity to analyze technological risk is inhibited in part because: a/ there is a confusion between low-probability/low-consequence events with low-probability/high consequence risks; and b/ a holistic approach in the analysis of risk is rarely adopted; and 3/ it is usual to underestimate the effects of catastrophic events. It is also argued that existing control systems, including federally regulatory bodies, are inadequate. There is a brief discussion on the difficulties likely to accompany the design and creation of risk control systems presented as a conclusion.
There are no comments on this title.