Love canal emergency declaration area habitability study. Final report. Vol 5 - peer review summary - TRC responses.
Material type:
TextLanguage: ENG Publication details: JUL 1988Description: 506p., 23 appendices, 6 figs, 9 tabs, 16 refsReport number: EPA-68-01-7251; EPA-68-01-7331; EPA902/4-88-002D; PB88-249149Subject: Environmental studies were conducted to provide data that could be used by the Commissioner of Health for the State of New York in determining whether the Emergency Declaration Area surrounding the Love Canal hazardous waste site is habitable. These volumes (2 through 5) were reviewed by a peer review panel of expert scientists. The scientists concluded that each of the three environmental studies was well planned and well executed. Volume 5 summarizes the peer review and gives additional information or clarifications as requested during the peer review. Volume 5 also provides additional supplemental statistical analyses requested by the peer review panel.
| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 363.7384 LOV (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005279030 | ||
|
Books
|
Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 363.7384 LOV (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005280152 |
Final report
Peer review summary - TRC responses - Part 1. Appendix A - final summary of modification to TAGA procedures, April 15, 1988: air assessment - indicator chemicals. Part 2
See also Vol 1, PB88-249107: Vol 2, PB88-249115: Vol 3, PB88-249123: Vol 4, PB88-249131
Vol 5 is in 2 parts. Part 1: Peer review summary TRC responses. Part 2: Appendix A - final summmary of modification to TAGA procedures, April 15, 1988: air assessment - indicator chemicals
Reprint
Environmental studies were conducted to provide data that could be used by the Commissioner of Health for the State of New York in determining whether the Emergency Declaration Area surrounding the Love Canal hazardous waste site is habitable. These volumes (2 through 5) were reviewed by a peer review panel of expert scientists. The scientists concluded that each of the three environmental studies was well planned and well executed. Volume 5 summarizes the peer review and gives additional information or clarifications as requested during the peer review. Volume 5 also provides additional supplemental statistical analyses requested by the peer review panel.
There are no comments on this title.