Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Levels of functional impairment following a civilian disaster: the Beverly Hills supper club fire.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextLanguage: ENG Publication details: 1983Description: 8p., 19 refsReport number: CommercialSubject: Disaster psychologySubject: Disaster researchSubject: Fire investigationsSubject: Stress (psychology)Subject: The Present study reports on levels of psychological functioning of survivors of the Beverley Hills Supper Club fire. Subjects (n = 117) who were at the fire and 30 subjects who were not at the fire (bereaved families, rescue workers) were assessed regarding objective stressfulness of their fire experience, subjective stressfulness, and intensity of psychological symptoms (using the Psychiatric Evaluation Form) in a structured clinical interview approximately 1 year after the fire. They also filled out the Symptom Checklist-90. Revised Version (SCL-90R). Eighty-eight subjects were followed up at 2 years. The latter group improved significantly on several measures from 1 to 2 years postfire, whereas the group at the fire showed little change. The results are discussed in the context of the specific instruments and methodology used in the present study, impairment levels of other samples, and the nature of the particular disaster
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Reprinted from Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983; Vol 51 No 4; pp573-580

Reprint

Disaster psychology

Disaster research

Fire investigations

Stress (psychology)

The Present study reports on levels of psychological functioning of survivors of the Beverley Hills Supper Club fire. Subjects (n = 117) who were at the fire and 30 subjects who were not at the fire (bereaved families, rescue workers) were assessed regarding objective stressfulness of their fire experience, subjective stressfulness, and intensity of psychological symptoms (using the Psychiatric Evaluation Form) in a structured clinical interview approximately 1 year after the fire. They also filled out the Symptom Checklist-90. Revised Version (SCL-90R). Eighty-eight subjects were followed up at 2 years. The latter group improved significantly on several measures from 1 to 2 years postfire, whereas the group at the fire showed little change. The results are discussed in the context of the specific instruments and methodology used in the present study, impairment levels of other samples, and the nature of the particular disaster

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha