Emergency actions and disaster reactions - an analysis of the Anchorage Public Works Department in the 1964 Alaskan earthquake.
Material type: TextLanguage: ENG Series: Disaster Research Center monograph series ; 05Publication details: 01/08/69Description: 145p; 18 refsReport number: CONTRACT-OCS-PD-64-46Subject: On March 27, 1964 Anchorage, Alaska was struck by an earthquake. Buildings and streets were damaged and essential water and sewer services disrupted. Within 27 hours of the impact a Disaster Research Center field team was dispatched to Anchorage to begin a study of the response of various community organizations to the disaster, a study which required 6 separate field trips and was concluded in the fall of 1965. A major part of this longitudinal study concerned the disaster responses of the Anchorage Public Works Department, the municipal agency most involved in meeting the emergency demands. Sixty in-depth interviews were conducted with members of this department. This monograph summarizes and analyzes this interview data. Additional written material supplements this data. The analysis employs two analytical schemes developed at DRC. One provides a framework for comparing organizational behavior during "normal" time (time one) and emergency (time two) operations. The other scheme distinguishes among four types of organizations comparing them by their structure and tasks. The analysis suggests that the behavior of members of the Anchorage Public Works Department during the emergency may usefully be characterized in emergency actions and disaster reactions. Members of maintenance divisions acted in terms of their standard emergency procedures; members of engineering divisions on the other hand, reacted to a unique and discontinuous event. They were required to improvise much of their response to the disaster, this improvisation being most clearly demonstrated in the time two emergence of a new engineering group within the Public Works Department. The distribution of time two operational problems in tasks, authority, decision making, and communications are related to this distinction between emergency actions and disaster reactions .550.Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 363.349509798 ADA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005261235 |
Browsing Australian Emergency Management Library shelves, Collection: BOOK Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Includes 3 figs and 1 table
On March 27, 1964 Anchorage, Alaska was struck by an earthquake. Buildings and streets were damaged and essential water and sewer services disrupted. Within 27 hours of the impact a Disaster Research Center field team was dispatched to Anchorage to begin a study of the response of various community organizations to the disaster, a study which required 6 separate field trips and was concluded in the fall of 1965. A major part of this longitudinal study concerned the disaster responses of the Anchorage Public Works Department, the municipal agency most involved in meeting the emergency demands. Sixty in-depth interviews were conducted with members of this department. This monograph summarizes and analyzes this interview data. Additional written material supplements this data. The analysis employs two analytical schemes developed at DRC. One provides a framework for comparing organizational behavior during "normal" time (time one) and emergency (time two) operations. The other scheme distinguishes among four types of organizations comparing them by their structure and tasks. The analysis suggests that the behavior of members of the Anchorage Public Works Department during the emergency may usefully be characterized in emergency actions and disaster reactions. Members of maintenance divisions acted in terms of their standard emergency procedures; members of engineering divisions on the other hand, reacted to a unique and discontinuous event. They were required to improvise much of their response to the disaster, this improvisation being most clearly demonstrated in the time two emergence of a new engineering group within the Public Works Department. The distribution of time two operational problems in tasks, authority, decision making, and communications are related to this distinction between emergency actions and disaster reactions .550.
There are no comments on this title.