Recovery from natural disasters : insurance or federal aid?.
Material type: TextLanguage: ENG Publication details: 1973Description: ix, 71 p. : illISBN:- 0844731226
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Australian Emergency Management Library | BOOK | 368.122 KUN (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 005277513 |
Browsing Australian Emergency Management Library shelves, Collection: BOOK Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Includes bibliographical references
Reprint
Makes a case for disaster insurance to replace the current federally subsidised disaster relief policy. The current disaster relief program has failed to discourage individuals from locating in hazard-prone areas and may reinforce their reluctance to insure themselves against potential losses. A quantitative answer to this problem is provided through a detailed analysis of Small Business Administration disaster loan files covering the Rapid City flood (1972) and tropical storm Agnes (1972). The findings are that disaster insurance is preferable to federal disaster relief from the point of view of both the home-owner and the federal government.
There are no comments on this title.